Author Archives: Julian Baggini
Reasons to be cheerful: despite what we see on the news, things are getting better all the time
Dutch historian Rutger Bregman's manifesto for optimism reads like a 400-page TED talk
The radical wrongness of Bernard Mandeville: the free marketeer whose bee analogy came back to sting him
His cherished text “The Fable of the Bees” is undermined by the fate of our modern pollinators
Was 2019 the year of “peak plane”?
There are various factors with the potential to cut flight numbers, of which Covid-19 is only one
How is the medical profession to cope with the appalling moral dilemmas it now faces?
The ethics of who lives and dies is one of the most sensitive and important problems raised by the current crisis
Trevor Phillips is no Islamophobe—but he is playing with fire
We should be free to criticise any religious belief system so long as we choose our words with care
Roger Scruton: a profound but controversial thinker who conceded nothing to intellectual fashion
The philosopher experimented with some contemptible views. But his work is serious and worth disagreeing with
What people get wrong about Bertrand Russell
Contrary to received wisdom his later work was of immense value
No quick fix will solve the obesity crisis
Public health proposals too often come with unintended consequences or simply fail to address the true problem
Patricia Churchland's radical approach to the study of consciousness
The question of how our minds work is one of life's greatest mysteries, fascinating scientists and philosophers alike. When Churchland brought their ideas together she provoked fury—and admiration
Reflections of a reluctant protestor: I loathe marches but even I couldn’t sit this one out
The prorogation protests will only work, however, if they transcend the Leave/Remain divide
Bryan Magee: 1930-2019—the champion of philosophical wonderment
The author, broadcaster and MP sparked a love of academic philosophy in countless curious viewers and readers
In praise of true diversity: privilege the individual, not the group
The diversity debate has lost sight of the fact that communities are made up of members who themselves may be very different